5dOpinion
The New Republic on MSNThe Supreme Court Muddied the Clean Water Act Yet AgainAmy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett said the Supreme Court reached a "puzzling" conclusion in a case on water regulations issued by the ...
1dOpinion
The New Republic on MSNAmy Coney Barrett Isn’t What the Conservative Legal Movement ExpectedThe Supreme Court’s second-newest justice is proving herself to be a non-hack—to the increasing consternation of MAGA.
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law’s Robert Weinstock and Alexa Longstaff say there are shortcomings to the Supreme Court ...
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court substantially weakened federal limitations on raw sewage discharge into nearby bodies of water.
The U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling on Tuesday that strikes down some rule that allowed the Environmental Protection ...
Barrett and Chief Justice John ... struck down rules regulating the discharge of water pollution in a decision narrowing the Clean Water Act. Jeremy Fogel, a former federal judge in California ...
On Tuesday, March 4, 2025, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in City and County of San Francisco, California v. Environmental Protection ...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that EPA cannot enforce requirements in wastewater permits that “do not spell out what a ...
The Supreme Court's conservative majority ruled for San Francisco in limiting the power of environmental regulators to ...
Barrett, in a partial dissent: "Receiving water limitations are not categorically inconsistent with the Clean Water Act. Because the Court holds otherwise, I respectfully dissent in part." ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results