Justice Amy Coney Barrett said the Supreme Court reached a "puzzling" conclusion in a case on water regulations issued ... The Clean Water Act of 1972 is a federal law governing water pollution in ...

A low-profile 2018 Clean Water Act case could offer clues into how President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett would rule on environmental issues. With few clues about how ...

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the majority had badly misread the text and history of the Clean Water Act’s provisions at issue. (The court’s three liberal ...

Senator Kamala Harris questions Amy Coney Barrett on climate change 03:28. ... The appeals court ruled that the government had not provided enough evidence that Clean Water Act protections were ...

Amy Coney Barrett was not having it. Tuesday’s ruling in San Francisco v.EPA revolves around restrictions on the release of pollution into large bodies of water. Like many American cities, San ...

Outrage after Amy Coney Barrett claims she ... our environmental laws' and that her 'record demonstrates her willingness to interpret environmental laws like the Clean Water Act narrowly in ...

Safe drinking water, clean air, healthy wildlife and natural habitat might not be front of mind as the Senate moves forward with President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Amy Coney Barrett ...

What Amy Coney Barrett Means For the Climate ... Environmental Protection Agency, that greenhouse gases qualify as a “pollutant” under the Clean Air Act of 1970. Next year, ...

Justice Amy Coney Barrett said the Supreme Court reached a "puzzling" conclusion in a case on water regulations issued ... The Clean Water Act of 1972 is a federal law governing water pollution in ...