The Supreme Court Ducked Another Big Abortion Case. Clarence Thomas Is Livid.
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
The court decided not to take the case brought against the government by an Air National Guard member who was paralyzed ...
The Root on MSN1d
Oh Lord, Republicans are Pushing for a Clarence Thomas Statue, But Here’s Why This Should Never HappenAs Republicans are enjoying their majority in both the House and Senate, they are also pushing forth their own (questionable) ...
Democrats have long opposed honoring Thomas, a Georgia native who was accused of sexual harassment during his 1991 confirmation hearing.
The Court refuses a case on ‘sidewalk counseling,’ over a vigorous dissent.
The justices have all but stopped issuing summary reversals, which are unsigned decisions used to correct clear errors by ...
1don MSNOpinion
New York City Mayor Eric Adams faces bribery charges, similar to those faced by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, and is ...
The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of a California police officer denied qualified immunity in a civil rights case. Justice Samuel Alito dissented.
Alexander Hamilton saw it coming. In the Federalist Papers, he described the judiciary as a feeble branch of government, easily “overpowered, awed or influenced” by Congress and the president. Lacking ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback